A case against targeting a single species for restoration within urban nature preserves.
By Heather Whitehouse, Senior Ecologist
Heather Whitehouse will present her restoration work on the Lathrop Nature Preserve at the SER World Conference 2021 Home page | SER 2021
The vision for any ecosystem restoration project is to maintain and enhance the biodiversity of the ecosystem being restored. But take care. Conflict can arise if you focus on enhancing or restoring habitat for a single species. If you don’t remain flexible, your restoration may end up inadvertently threatening other species on site. Let’s look at one example of how flexibility in a restoration plan led to better outcomes – both for at-risk species, and for clients.
An Ecological Gem
The Lathrop Nature Preserve in Southern Ontario is an ecological gem. Located within the Niagara Escarpment (a UNESCO World Heritage Site), the site contains Carolinian forest and wetland habitat which support many Species at Risk.
At the start of this project, our client and stakeholders had a key goal – improve the downstream habitat for a rare cold-water fish species. The Lathrop Nature Preserve is currently managed for conservation purposes. Historically, the property was altered by construction and the operation of a now decommissioned rail line. Today, that rail line serves as a pedestrian trail through portions of the property. Back when the rail line was first installed, it was necessary to fill several valleys on the property, which resulted in a constructed embankment. This embankment impounds groundwater seepage and overland flow within the former valley areas. The result? Two anthropogenic ponds were formed, that is, ponds that are the result of human activity. These ponds naturally overflow into a headwater tributary of a cold-water creek, and they have been identified as contributing to increased water temperatures, which may be causing negative impacts on downstream cold-water fish habitat.
Clear Targets
The approach for achieving the restoration target for the Lathrop Nature Preserve was clear: Remove the ponds and direct groundwater seepage towards the downstream cold-water creek. Historically, the ponds had been observed to contain goldfish, a non-native species, a species we did not need to worry about protecting.
At the outset of our restoration project, we conducted new baseline wildlife studies at the two ponds. In the process, we observed that the ponds provided overwintering and foraging habitat for two turtle species of concern. So, through these baseline studies, we discovered that the restoration target to improve downstream cold-water fish habitat by removing the ponds would conflict with the restoration vision of maintaining and enhancing the biodiversity of the project site. So, what next?
By Heather Whitehouse, Senior Ecologist
Heather Whitehouse will present her restoration work on the Lathrop Nature Preserve at the SER World Conference 2021 Home page | SER 2021
The vision for any ecosystem restoration project is to maintain and enhance the biodiversity of the ecosystem being restored. But take care. Conflict can arise if you focus on enhancing or restoring habitat for a single species. If you don’t remain flexible, your restoration may end up inadvertently threatening other species on site. Let’s look at one example of how flexibility in a restoration plan led to better outcomes – both for at-risk species, and for clients.
An Ecological Gem
The Lathrop Nature Preserve in Southern Ontario is an ecological gem. Located within the Niagara Escarpment (a UNESCO World Heritage Site), the site contains Carolinian forest and wetland habitat which support many Species at Risk.
At the start of this project, our client and stakeholders had a key goal – improve the downstream habitat for a rare cold-water fish species. The Lathrop Nature Preserve is currently managed for conservation purposes. Historically, the property was altered by construction and the operation of a now decommissioned rail line. Today, that rail line serves as a pedestrian trail through portions of the property. Back when the rail line was first installed, it was necessary to fill several valleys on the property, which resulted in a constructed embankment. This embankment impounds groundwater seepage and overland flow within the former valley areas. The result? Two anthropogenic ponds were formed, that is, ponds that are the result of human activity. These ponds naturally overflow into a headwater tributary of a cold-water creek, and they have been identified as contributing to increased water temperatures, which may be causing negative impacts on downstream cold-water fish habitat.
Clear Targets
The approach for achieving the restoration target for the Lathrop Nature Preserve was clear: Remove the ponds and direct groundwater seepage towards the downstream cold-water creek. Historically, the ponds had been observed to contain goldfish, a non-native species, a species we did not need to worry about protecting.
At the outset of our restoration project, we conducted new baseline wildlife studies at the two ponds. In the process, we observed that the ponds provided overwintering and foraging habitat for two turtle species of concern. So, through these baseline studies, we discovered that the restoration target to improve downstream cold-water fish habitat by removing the ponds would conflict with the restoration vision of maintaining and enhancing the biodiversity of the project site. So, what next?
